Parliamentarian Namal Rajapaksa has wailed over the way that his mom, previous first woman Shiranthi Rajapaksa has been summoned before the FCID. The scion of the Rajapaksa family needs his mom and siblings not subject to badgering on the premise that they were not included in legislative issues. Let the Government would whatever they like to me and to my dad he appears to say. Creating an impression in his authority facebook page the MP said: "My mom has constantly stayed far from governmental issues. Does she merit this provocation"?
Passing by Namal Rajapaksa's rationale the laws of the area ought not have any significant bearing to whatever is left of the Rajapaksa family just in light of the fact that they were not included in governmental issues. On the off chance that so the nation's law requirement and equity framework has blundered in taking into care Shashi Weerawansa on the grounds that as far as anyone is concerned she too did not fiddle with governmental issues despite the fact that her spouse was a capable Government Minister.
To take Namal's' rationale further, even his own particular father has broken this idea by allowing the capture of Malaka Silva who ought to have been left to his own devises in light of the fact that his dad too was an effective Government Minister. (As far as anyone is concerned Malaka too was not included in legislative issues). To take this contention to further levels even Danuna Thilakaratne the child in- law of the previous Army Commander ought to have not have been made the subject of a huge man chase in light of the fact that Sarath Fonseka was a Presidential applicant and a lawmaker in every feeling of the word.
 |
|---|
It is interesting that Namal Rajapaksa being a legal advisor ought to put forth such expressions. Does he not consider the idea that each subject in the nation is measure up to under the watchful eye of the law and that equity is no respector of people despite the fact that the last idea it must be said was seen in the rupture lately? Does youthful Rajapaksa accept that the courts of law in our nation exist just for those, for example, the occupants from Medamulana and is a no go zone for the self important particularly in the event that they were the mates and posterity of an ousted President ? "Allow my mom and siblings to sit unbothered" Namal states in his official Face Book page. We expect that youthful Rajapaksa is unquestionably not going to go far in his lawful vocation given his stance that life partners and posterity of government officials ought to be insusceptible from presentation in the witness of the law.
Albeit Namal Rajapaksa won't admit to it the whole country is mindful of the favored status that was appreciated by all individuals from the previous first family and even the more distant family. Doubtlessly this set them in a position to mishandle the forces of their patriarch to store up riches through lucrative arrangements, for example, Television rights for International cricket matches and different business wanders whose legitimateness is currently under test.
It was likewise an open mystery how the previous President administered largesse to his prompt relatives at state cost and how state property was mishandled to pander to the impulses of relatives. It was additionally no doubt understood how Presidential posterity were given a free rushed to practice their indulgences be it riding extraordinarily imported stallions, having the night races in the city and in the area of the Temple of the Sacred Tooth Relic or the utilization of Air Force helicopters with gay surrender with the expectation of complimentary travel.
The youthful MP with his legitimate preparing will be the first to recognize that ill-use of state property is an offense in our state books as with utilizing the high office of his dad to take part in faulty business wanders. Whoever against whom there is confirmation ought to be liable to the full drive of the law. It will be up to the courts to choose if a man is blameworthy or not.
There ought to be no inner conflict on this score. In the event that as youthful Rajapaksa says his mom or siblings ought not be "irritated" on the grounds that they were not included in governmental issues like him or his dad this would add up to a tragedy of equity considering what number of persons today mull in our correctional facilities for offenses that pale into unimportance contrasted with the iniquity that was seen lately. It will likewise make an awful point of reference permitting posterity and friends and relatives of government officials a permit to do however they see fit.
In the event that as inferred by youthful Rajapaksa the offer to bring the previous first woman in the eyes of the law is a witch chase this could likewise be presented to the general population. The law accommodates the methods whereby such activities could be recognized and those behind the move named and disgraced. However, to propose that the law ought to be noiseless by refering to special conditions, for example, the one anticipated by Namal Rajapaksa is to raise doubt about the law's application and the entire idea of equity under the watchful eye of the law.
The Yahapalanaya presented by President Sirisena fundamentally infers the fair-minded utilization of the law. Its specific application could just prompt a disintegration of the whole equity framework getting its wake tumult and social issue.